International Relations Theories as instruments of domination: a critical analysis of (neo)realism and paths for the transformation of the field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47236/2594-7036.2025.v9.1796Keywords:
Critical theory, Hegemony, International RelationsAbstract
International Relations theories gained particular prominence in the post-war and Cold War periods, reflecting a persistent quest for autonomy and distinction within the academic realm. During this moment, realist theories notably rose to dominance, offering interpretations of international relations while simultaneously shaping and legitimizing hegemonic relations of domination, predominantly underpinned by power dynamics favoring recognized hegemonic powers, notably the United States. This research critically examines the instrumental use of these mainstream theories to illustrate how these theories reinforce and perpetuate unequal and unjust global power structures. In addition to scrutinizing the limitations and inconsistencies of realism, alternative theoretical approaches, such as critical perspectives in International Relations, are explored. These alternatives go beyond mere description and reproduction of power relations to interrogate their origins and consequences, thereby facilitating avenues for change. The study is structured into three main sections: an introduction to the field of International Relations and its challenges, a detailed exploration of critical theory as a counterpoint to realism, and a specific analysis of (neo)realist assumptions and their contemporary implications. Ultimately, this study aims to contribute for possibilities of transformation within the discipline of International Relations.Downloads
Metrics
References
BALDWIN, David A. Neoliberalism, Neorealism and World Politics. In: BALDWIN, David A. (ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. p. 3-25.
BULL, Hedley. A sociedade anárquica: um estudo da ordem na política mundial. Brasília: Editora UnB, Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, 2002.
CARR, Edward H. Vinte anos de crise: 1919-1939. Brasília: Editora UnB, 1981.
COX, Robert W. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 12, n. 2, 1 jun. 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701
COX, Robert W. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 10, n. 2, p. 126-155, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
DUNBAR-ORTIZ, Roxanne. America’s Founding Myths. Jacobin, 2014. Disponível em: https://jacobin.com/2014/11/americas-founding-myths/. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2024.
FEARON, James D. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization, v. 49, n. 3, p. 379-414, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033324
GUILHOT, Nicolas (ed.). The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
KARNAL, Leandro; PURDY, Sean; FERNANDES, Luiz E.; DE MORAIS, Marcus V. História dos Estados Unidos: das origens ao século XXI. São Paulo: Contexto, 2007.
LINKLATER, Andrew. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. London: Routledge, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960905
MARINI, Ruy M. Subdesarrollo y Revolución. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 1974.
MORGENTHAU, Hans. A política entre as nações. Brasília: Editora UnB, Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais, 2003.
OSORIO, Jaime. Sobre o Estado, o poder político e o Estado dependente. Temporalis, Vitória, v. 17, n. 34, p. 25-51, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22422/2238-1856.2017v17n34p25-51
VITALIS, Robert. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015.
WALT, Stephen M. The Myth of American Exceptionalism. Foreign Policy, 11 out. 2011. Disponível em: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/the-myth-of-american-exceptionalism/. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2024.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1979.
ZALEWSKI, Marysia. All these theories and the bodies keep piling up: theories, theorists, theorizing. In: SMITH, Steve; BOOTH, Ken; ZALEWSKI, Marysia (ed.). International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. p. 340-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.020
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Heitor Novelini da Cruz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
It allows sharing, adaptation, and use for any purpose, including commercial use, provided proper attribution is given to the authors and to Revista Sítio Novo.
The authors declare that the work is original and has not been previously published, in whole or in part, except on recognized preprint servers, if declared, and that no other similar manuscript authored by them is published or under review by another journal, whether printed or electronic.
They declare that they have not violated or infringed upon any proprietary rights of others, and that all citations in the text are factual or based on research with scientifically significant accuracy.
The authors retain the copyright of the manuscripts published in this journal, allowing unrestricted use of their content, provided that the original authorship and the publication source are properly cited.
