Eficácia do planejamento estratégico e inovação ambidestra na RFEPCT: o papel mediador das capacidades dinâmicas

Alessandra Bezerra de Melo; Danilo Lima da Guia; Denilson Maciel Sousa; Marcio Antonio do Rosário Miranda; William Corrêa Mendes

doi:10.47236/2594-7036.2026.v10.2156

Authors

Alessandra Bezerra de Melo Federal Institute of Maranhão https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0409-3887
Danilo Lima da Guia Federal Institute of Maranhão https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3662-7550
Denilson Maciel Sousa Federal Institute of Maranhão https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-9855
Marcio Antonio do Rosário Miranda Federal Institute of Maranhão https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1729-9876
William Corrêa Mendes Federal Institute of Maranhão https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8272-8549

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47236/2594-7036.2026.v10.2156

Keywords:

Ambidextrous innovation, Dynamic capabilities, Strategic planning

Abstract

This article developed and tested a research model examining the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities on the association between strategic planning effectiveness and ambidextrous innovation in institutions of Brazil's Federal Network of Vocational, Scientific and Technological Education (RFEPCT). The study adopted a quantitative cross-sectional approach, with data collected via a questionnaire administered to 250 RFEPCT employees and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results supported all formulated hypotheses, indicating that strategic planning effectiveness positively influences dynamic capabilities and ambidextrous innovation, and that dynamic capabilities partially mediate this relationship. The study broadens the application of Dynamic Capabilities Theory to the public educational sector, demonstrating that strategic planning acts as a catalyst for adaptive routines in regulated contexts. As a practical contribution, it is recommended that strategic planning be conceived as a continuous process connected to internal transformation mechanisms, fostering more agile and innovative public institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Alessandra Bezerra de Melo, Federal Institute of Maranhão

Doctoral Candidate in Accounting and Business Administration at FUCAPE Research and Education. Information Technology Analyst and Coordinator of Networks, Infrastructure, and IT Services at the Information Technology Management Directorate of the Rectory of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. E-mail: alessandra.melo@ifma.edu.br. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0409-3887. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2036737601476246.

Danilo Lima da Guia, Federal Institute of Maranhão

Doctoral Candidate in Accounting and Business Administration at FUCAPE Research and Education. Director of Administration and Electrical Engineer in the Department of Infrastructure of the Office of the Vice President for Administration at the Rectory of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. E-mail: danilo.guia@ifma.edu.br. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3662-7550. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6859408291073794.

Denilson Maciel Sousa, Federal Institute of Maranhão

Doctoral Candidate in Accounting and Business Administration at FUCAPE Research and Education. Administrative Assistant at the Rectory of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. E-mail: denilson.sousa@ifma.edu.br. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-9855. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7089096172495061.

Marcio Antonio do Rosário Miranda, Federal Institute of Maranhão

Doctoral Candidate in Accounting and Business Administration at FUCAPE Research and Education. Civil Engineer, Administration Department at the Rectory of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. E-mail: marcio.miranda@ifma.edu.br. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1729-9876. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2030773798314295.

William Corrêa Mendes, Federal Institute of Maranhão

Doctoral Candidate in Accounting and Business Administration at FUCAPE Research and Education. Information Technology Analyst and Director of Information Technology Managementat the Rectory of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Maranhão. São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. E-mail: william.mendes@ifma.edu.br. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8272-8549. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7726054867638395.

References

ALHAMMADI, Bader et al. Examining the interplay between managerial ties, dynamic capabilities and innovation climate in driving balanced and combined ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Asia Business Studies, v. 18, n. 6, p. 1465–1482, 11 nov. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2023-0407

ALI ALMANSOORI, Bakheeta Saeed; ASMAI, Siti Azirah. Gauging the Importance of Strategic Foresight Factors Affecting Public Organisational Dynamic Capabilities. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, v. 12, n. 5, 31 dez. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.035

ALMEIDA DANTAS, Daniela et al. Perfil Socioeconômico e Hábito de Consumo de Bebidas à Base de Frutas de Servidores de um Instituto Federal de Educação. Ensaios e Ciência C Biológicas Agrárias e da Saúde, v. 25, n. 5- esp., p. 655–660, 14 mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17921/1415-6938.2021v25n5-esp.p655-660

ARAÚJO, Gleycianne Rodrigues; KATO, Heitor Takashi; DEL CORSO, Jansen Maia. Dynamic capabilities, strategic planning and performance: a virtuous and mutually reinforcing cycle. Journal of Management & Organization, v. 28, n. 5, p. 1116–1132, set. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.33

BAHARUDDIN, Aris et al. Menjembatani Eksplorasi dan Eksploitasi: Ambidextrous Leadership dalam Transformasi Pelayanan Publik Indonesia. Jurnal Pallangga Praja (JPP), v. 5, n. 2, p. 147–154, 6 dez. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61076/jpp.v5i2.3734

BAHIA, Ana Celia. Profissão acadêmica: participação associativa e inserção em redes e em grupos de pesquisa - um inquérito em três universidades na Amazônia brasileira. Liinc em Revista, v. 10, n. 2, p. e3578, 5 dez. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v10i2.733

BIDO, Diógenes De Souza; SILVA, Dirceu da. SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, v. 20, n. 2, p. 488–536, 2 maio 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545

BOUKAMEL, Owen; EMERY, Yves. Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Innovation Journal, v. 22, n. 2, p. 1–27, 2017.

BRASIL. PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA. Lei no 11.892, de 29 de dezembro de 2008. Institui a Rede Federal de Educação Profissional, Científica e Tecnológica, cria os Institutos Federais de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, e dá outras providências. , 29 dez. 2008. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11892.htm.

BRYSON, John M.; ACKERMANN, Fran; EDEN, Colin. Putting the Resource‐Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies to Work in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, v. 67, n. 4, p. 702–717, jul. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00754.x

CHAKMA, Rubina; PAUL, Justin; DHIR, Sanjay. Organizational Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 71, p. 121–137, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3114609

CHANG, Ching-Hsun; CHEN, Yu-Shan; TSENG, Chin-Wei. Digital transformation anxiety: absorptive capacity, dynamic capability, and digital innovation performance. Management Decision, v. 63, n. 3, p. 734–755, 24 fev. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2023-1363

DANKS, Nicholas P.; SHARMA, Pratyush N.; SARSTEDT, Marko. Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Business Research, v. 113, p. 13–24, maio 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.019

EISENHARDT, Kathleen M.; MARTIN, Jeffrey A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 10–11, p. 1105–1121, out. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

FARZANEH, Mandana et al. Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, v. 148, p. 47–59, set. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030

FORNELL, Claes; LARCKER, David F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, n. 1, p. 39–50, fev. 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

GARCÍA-HURTADO, Dayanis et al. Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 345–366, mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00795-5

GULLMARK, Petter. Do All Roads Lead to Innovativeness? A Study of Public Sector Organizations’ Innovation Capabilities. The American Review of Public Administration, v. 51, n. 7, p. 509–525, set. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211010464

GÜNTNER, Amelie Verena et al. Training Adaptive Leadership: On the Role of Leader Cognitions and Behaviors. Academy of Management Proceedings, v. 2022, n. 1, p. 12310, ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.12310abstract

HAIR, Joe F.; HOWARD, Matt C.; NITZL, Christian. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, v. 109, p. 101–110, mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

HAIR, Joseph F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2–24, 14 jan. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

HAIR, Joseph F. et al. Evaluation of Reflective Measurement Models. In: HAIR, Joseph F. et al. (Eds.). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Classroom Companion: Business. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. p. 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_4

HAIR, Joseph F. et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Third edition ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

HAMBLIN, Richard et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliometric Review and Framework for Future Public Administration Research. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1073–1109, 2 set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2373178

HENSELER, Jörg; RINGLE, Christian M.; SARSTEDT, Marko. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 43, n. 1, p. 115–135, jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

JURKSIENE, Lolita; PUNDZIENE, Asta. The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business Review, v. 28, n. 4, p. 431–448, 13 jun. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0088

LEANDRO CANDIDO, José; NÓBREGA BARBOSA, Maria de Fátima. Uma proposta de análise do planejamento estratégico em instituições federais de ensino superior. Polêm!ca, v. 17, n. 3, p. 093–110, 30 out. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/polemica.2017.31045

LIN, Hsing‐Er et al. Managing the Exploitation/Exploration Paradox: The Role of a Learning Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 30, n. 2, p. 262–278, mar. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x

LOUREIRO, Ruben et al. Dynamic capabilities in public sector: theoretical insights and research agenda. International Journal of Business Excellence, v. 25, n. 2, p. 233, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2021.119458

MAZZUCATO, Mariana; KATTEL, Rainer. COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 36, n. Supplement_1, p. S256–S269, 28 set. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031

MUNEEB, Dilnaz et al. Role of dynamic capabilities in driving competitiveness of higher educational institutions. Management Research Review, v. 48, n. 7, p. 1121–1147, 27 maio 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2024-0424

NUNES, Francisco G.; NASCIMENTO, Generosa do; MARTINS, Luís M. Introducing the Contextual Ambidexterity Scale for Public Organizations (CASPO): Scale development and initial evidence. ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, n. 37, p. 74–89, 29 nov. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2021.37-05

OJHA, Divesh; PATEL, Pankaj C.; SRIDHARAN, Sri V. Dynamic strategic planning and firm competitive performance: A conceptualization and an empirical test. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 222, p. 107509, abr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.030

O’REILLY, Charles A.; TUSHMAN, Michael L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 28, p. 185–206, jan. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002

OSORIO-LONDOÑO, Andrés A. et al. The Influence of Knowledge Management on Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, v. 20, n. 04, p. 2150045, dez. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649221500453

PABLO, Amy L. et al. Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector*. Journal of Management Studies, v. 44, n. 5, p. 687–708, jul. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x

PALM, Klas; LILJA, Johan. Key enabling factors for organizational ambidexterity in the public sector. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, v. 9, n. 1, p. 2–20, 20 mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038

PETAR, N. V. The Role of CPD Programs in Supporting Teachers’ Application of Innovative Teaching Methods. Research and Advances in Education, v. 3, n. 9, p. 47–51, set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2024.09.04

POSCH, Arthur; GARAUS, Christian. Boon or curse? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, v. 53, n. 6, p. 101878, dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.03.004

PRIYANKA; JAIN, Mahima; DHIR, Sanjay. Antecedents of organization ambidexterity: A comparative study of public and private sector organizations. Technology in Society, v. 70, p. 102046, ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102046

SCHNEIDER, Leandro Rodrigo. THE INFLUENCE OF BUREAUCRACY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS. Sustainable Business International Journal, v. 1, n. 94, 30 jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22409/sbij.v1i94.50526

SCOTT, Nehemiah. Ambidextrous Strategies and Innovation Priorities: Adequately Priming the Pump for Continual Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 4, n. 7, p. 44–51, 29 jul. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/812

SIJABAT, Eduard Alfian Syamsya et al. The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Creativity and Ambidextrous Innovation on Firm’s Competitiveness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, v. 8, n. 1, p. 711–721, 30 jan. 2021.

TEECE, David J. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319–1350, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

TEECE, David J.; PISANO, Gary; SHUEN, Amy. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509–533, ago. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

THEOHARAKIS, Vasilis; ZHENG, Yuyan; ZHANG, Long. Dynamic strategic marketing planning: The paradox of concurrently reconfiguring and implementing strategic marketing planning. Journal of Business Research, v. 174, p. 114525, mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114525

TRAMONTIN CASTANHA, Eduardo; BEUREN, Ilse Maria; GASPARETTO, Valdirene. Influência da comunicação interna e do engajamento no desempenho de tarefas de servidores públicos. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, v. 10, n. 20, p. 179–200, 22 dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-20-2020-10-179-200

VANDERSMISSEN, Laure; GEORGE, Bert. Strategic planning in public organizations: reviewing 35 years of research. International Public Management Journal, v. 27, n. 4, p. 633–658, 3 jul. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2271901

ZEEBAREE, Mohammed R. Yaseen. The Effect of Organizational Flexibility on Organizational Ambidexterity in Higher Education Institutions in Iraq. International Review of Management and Marketing, v. 14, n. 2, p. 23–36, 19 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.15705

ZHAO, Xinshu; LYNCH, John G.; CHEN, Qimei. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 37, n. 2, p. 197–206, ago. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257