Eficacia de la planificación estratégica e innovación ambidextra en la RFEPCT
el papel mediador de las capacidades dinámicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47236/2594-7036.2026.v10.2156Palabras clave:
Capacidades dinámicas, Innovación ambidextra, Planificación estratégicaResumen
Este artículo desarrolló y probó un modelo de investigación que examina el efecto mediador de las capacidades dinámicas en la asociación entre la eficacia de la planificación estratégica y la innovación ambidextra en las instituciones de la Red Federal de Educación Profesional, Científica y Tecnológica de Brasil (RFEPCT). El estudio adoptó un enfoque cuantitativo con corte transversal, con datos recopilados mediante un cuestionario aplicado a 250 servidores de la RFEPCT, analizados mediante Modelado de Ecuaciones Estructurales con estimación por Mínimos Cuadrados Parciales (PLS-SEM). Los resultados respaldaron todas las hipótesis formuladas, evidenciando que la eficacia de la planificación estratégica influye positivamente en las capacidades dinámicas y en la innovación ambidextra, y que las capacidades dinámicas ejercen una mediación parcial en esta relación. El estudio amplía la aplicación de la Teoría de las Capacidades Dinámicas al sector público educativo, demostrando que la planificación estratégica actúa como catalizador de rutinas adaptativas en contextos regulados. Como contribución práctica, se recomienda concebir la planificación estratégica como un proceso continuo y conectado a mecanismos internos de transformación, favoreciendo instituciones públicas más ágiles e innovadorasDescargas
Métricas
Citas
ALHAMMADI, Bader et al. Examining the interplay between managerial ties, dynamic capabilities and innovation climate in driving balanced and combined ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Asia Business Studies, v. 18, n. 6, p. 1465–1482, 11 nov. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2023-0407
ALI ALMANSOORI, Bakheeta Saeed; ASMAI, Siti Azirah. Gauging the Importance of Strategic Foresight Factors Affecting Public Organisational Dynamic Capabilities. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, v. 12, n. 5, 31 dez. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.035
ALMEIDA DANTAS, Daniela et al. Perfil Socioeconômico e Hábito de Consumo de Bebidas à Base de Frutas de Servidores de um Instituto Federal de Educação. Ensaios e Ciência C Biológicas Agrárias e da Saúde, v. 25, n. 5- esp., p. 655–660, 14 mar. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17921/1415-6938.2021v25n5-esp.p655-660
ARAÚJO, Gleycianne Rodrigues; KATO, Heitor Takashi; DEL CORSO, Jansen Maia. Dynamic capabilities, strategic planning and performance: a virtuous and mutually reinforcing cycle. Journal of Management & Organization, v. 28, n. 5, p. 1116–1132, set. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.33
BAHARUDDIN, Aris et al. Menjembatani Eksplorasi dan Eksploitasi: Ambidextrous Leadership dalam Transformasi Pelayanan Publik Indonesia. Jurnal Pallangga Praja (JPP), v. 5, n. 2, p. 147–154, 6 dez. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61076/jpp.v5i2.3734
BAHIA, Ana Celia. Profissão acadêmica: participação associativa e inserção em redes e em grupos de pesquisa - um inquérito em três universidades na Amazônia brasileira. Liinc em Revista, v. 10, n. 2, p. e3578, 5 dez. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v10i2.733
BIDO, Diógenes De Souza; SILVA, Dirceu da. SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, v. 20, n. 2, p. 488–536, 2 maio 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545
BOUKAMEL, Owen; EMERY, Yves. Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Innovation Journal, v. 22, n. 2, p. 1–27, 2017.
BRASIL. PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA. Lei no 11.892, de 29 de dezembro de 2008. Institui a Rede Federal de Educação Profissional, Científica e Tecnológica, cria os Institutos Federais de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, e dá outras providências. , 29 dez. 2008. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11892.htm.
BRYSON, John M.; ACKERMANN, Fran; EDEN, Colin. Putting the Resource‐Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies to Work in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, v. 67, n. 4, p. 702–717, jul. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00754.x
CHAKMA, Rubina; PAUL, Justin; DHIR, Sanjay. Organizational Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 71, p. 121–137, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3114609
CHANG, Ching-Hsun; CHEN, Yu-Shan; TSENG, Chin-Wei. Digital transformation anxiety: absorptive capacity, dynamic capability, and digital innovation performance. Management Decision, v. 63, n. 3, p. 734–755, 24 fev. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2023-1363
DANKS, Nicholas P.; SHARMA, Pratyush N.; SARSTEDT, Marko. Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Business Research, v. 113, p. 13–24, maio 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.019
EISENHARDT, Kathleen M.; MARTIN, Jeffrey A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 10–11, p. 1105–1121, out. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
FARZANEH, Mandana et al. Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, v. 148, p. 47–59, set. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030
FORNELL, Claes; LARCKER, David F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, n. 1, p. 39–50, fev. 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
GARCÍA-HURTADO, Dayanis et al. Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 345–366, mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00795-5
GULLMARK, Petter. Do All Roads Lead to Innovativeness? A Study of Public Sector Organizations’ Innovation Capabilities. The American Review of Public Administration, v. 51, n. 7, p. 509–525, set. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211010464
GÜNTNER, Amelie Verena et al. Training Adaptive Leadership: On the Role of Leader Cognitions and Behaviors. Academy of Management Proceedings, v. 2022, n. 1, p. 12310, ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.12310abstract
HAIR, Joe F.; HOWARD, Matt C.; NITZL, Christian. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, v. 109, p. 101–110, mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
HAIR, Joseph F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2–24, 14 jan. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
HAIR, Joseph F. et al. Evaluation of Reflective Measurement Models. In: HAIR, Joseph F. et al. (Eds.). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Classroom Companion: Business. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. p. 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_4
HAIR, Joseph F. et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Third edition ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
HAMBLIN, Richard et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliometric Review and Framework for Future Public Administration Research. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1073–1109, 2 set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2373178
HENSELER, Jörg; RINGLE, Christian M.; SARSTEDT, Marko. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 43, n. 1, p. 115–135, jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
JURKSIENE, Lolita; PUNDZIENE, Asta. The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business Review, v. 28, n. 4, p. 431–448, 13 jun. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0088
LEANDRO CANDIDO, José; NÓBREGA BARBOSA, Maria de Fátima. Uma proposta de análise do planejamento estratégico em instituições federais de ensino superior. Polêm!ca, v. 17, n. 3, p. 093–110, 30 out. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/polemica.2017.31045
LIN, Hsing‐Er et al. Managing the Exploitation/Exploration Paradox: The Role of a Learning Capability and Innovation Ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 30, n. 2, p. 262–278, mar. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x
LOUREIRO, Ruben et al. Dynamic capabilities in public sector: theoretical insights and research agenda. International Journal of Business Excellence, v. 25, n. 2, p. 233, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2021.119458
MAZZUCATO, Mariana; KATTEL, Rainer. COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 36, n. Supplement_1, p. S256–S269, 28 set. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031
MUNEEB, Dilnaz et al. Role of dynamic capabilities in driving competitiveness of higher educational institutions. Management Research Review, v. 48, n. 7, p. 1121–1147, 27 maio 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2024-0424
NUNES, Francisco G.; NASCIMENTO, Generosa do; MARTINS, Luís M. Introducing the Contextual Ambidexterity Scale for Public Organizations (CASPO): Scale development and initial evidence. ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, n. 37, p. 74–89, 29 nov. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2021.37-05
OJHA, Divesh; PATEL, Pankaj C.; SRIDHARAN, Sri V. Dynamic strategic planning and firm competitive performance: A conceptualization and an empirical test. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 222, p. 107509, abr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.030
O’REILLY, Charles A.; TUSHMAN, Michael L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 28, p. 185–206, jan. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
OSORIO-LONDOÑO, Andrés A. et al. The Influence of Knowledge Management on Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, v. 20, n. 04, p. 2150045, dez. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649221500453
PABLO, Amy L. et al. Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector*. Journal of Management Studies, v. 44, n. 5, p. 687–708, jul. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x
PALM, Klas; LILJA, Johan. Key enabling factors for organizational ambidexterity in the public sector. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, v. 9, n. 1, p. 2–20, 20 mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038
PETAR, N. V. The Role of CPD Programs in Supporting Teachers’ Application of Innovative Teaching Methods. Research and Advances in Education, v. 3, n. 9, p. 47–51, set. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2024.09.04
POSCH, Arthur; GARAUS, Christian. Boon or curse? A contingent view on the relationship between strategic planning and organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, v. 53, n. 6, p. 101878, dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.03.004
PRIYANKA; JAIN, Mahima; DHIR, Sanjay. Antecedents of organization ambidexterity: A comparative study of public and private sector organizations. Technology in Society, v. 70, p. 102046, ago. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102046
SCHNEIDER, Leandro Rodrigo. THE INFLUENCE OF BUREAUCRACY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS. Sustainable Business International Journal, v. 1, n. 94, 30 jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22409/sbij.v1i94.50526
SCOTT, Nehemiah. Ambidextrous Strategies and Innovation Priorities: Adequately Priming the Pump for Continual Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 4, n. 7, p. 44–51, 29 jul. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/812
SIJABAT, Eduard Alfian Syamsya et al. The Effects of Dynamic Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Creativity and Ambidextrous Innovation on Firm’s Competitiveness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, v. 8, n. 1, p. 711–721, 30 jan. 2021.
TEECE, David J. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319–1350, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
TEECE, David J.; PISANO, Gary; SHUEN, Amy. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509–533, ago. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
THEOHARAKIS, Vasilis; ZHENG, Yuyan; ZHANG, Long. Dynamic strategic marketing planning: The paradox of concurrently reconfiguring and implementing strategic marketing planning. Journal of Business Research, v. 174, p. 114525, mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114525
TRAMONTIN CASTANHA, Eduardo; BEUREN, Ilse Maria; GASPARETTO, Valdirene. Influência da comunicação interna e do engajamento no desempenho de tarefas de servidores públicos. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, v. 10, n. 20, p. 179–200, 22 dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-20-2020-10-179-200
VANDERSMISSEN, Laure; GEORGE, Bert. Strategic planning in public organizations: reviewing 35 years of research. International Public Management Journal, v. 27, n. 4, p. 633–658, 3 jul. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2023.2271901
ZEEBAREE, Mohammed R. Yaseen. The Effect of Organizational Flexibility on Organizational Ambidexterity in Higher Education Institutions in Iraq. International Review of Management and Marketing, v. 14, n. 2, p. 23–36, 19 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.15705
ZHAO, Xinshu; LYNCH, John G.; CHEN, Qimei. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 37, n. 2, p. 197–206, ago. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Alessandra Bezerra de Melo, Danilo Lima da Guia, Denilson Maciel Sousa, Marcio Antonio do Rosário Miranda, William Corrêa Mendes
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Permite el intercambio, la adaptación y el uso para cualquier fin, incluso comercial, siempre que se otorgue la debida atribución a los autores y a la Revista Sítio Novo.
Los autores declaran que el trabajo es original y que no ha sido publicado previamente, ni total ni parcialmente, salvo en servidores de preprints reconocidos, siempre que se declare, y que ningún otro manuscrito similar de su autoría se encuentra publicado ni en proceso de evaluación por otra revista, ya sea impresa o electrónica.
Declaran que no han violado ni infringido ningún tipo de derecho de propiedad de terceros, y que todas las citas en el texto son hechos verídicos o están basadas en investigaciones con exactitud científicamente comprobable.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor de los manuscritos publicados en esta revista, permitiendo el uso irrestricto de su contenido, siempre que se cite adecuadamente la autoría original y la fuente de publicación.
