Governança de dados no setor público: caracterização do estado da arte por bibliometria e revisão sistemática

Francimayra Oliveira Cardoso; Alexandre de Souza Corrêa

doi:10.47236/2594-7036.2026.v10.2236

Authors

Francimayra Oliveira Cardoso Federal University of Grande Dourados https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2957-2078
Alexandre de Souza Corrêa Federal University of Grande Dourados https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-5768

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47236/2594-7036.2026.v10.2236

Keywords:

Bibliometric analysis, Data governance, Methodi Ordinatio, Public sector, Systematic literature review

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and systematize the scientific literature on data governance in the public sector, focusing on identifying practices, models, institutional approaches, and recurring challenges. The analysis is grounded in concepts such as data governance, information quality, organizational capabilities, institutional coordination, accountability, and public value creation, viewing governance as a strategic mechanism to support data-driven public administration. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted using the Methodi Ordinatio method, with searches performed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. A portfolio of 175 articles underwent bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software, and subsequently, a subset of nine articles was selected for in-depth qualitative analysis. The results indicate that, despite the recent growth of the topic, the literature is fragmented across disciplinary silos and lacks theoretical integration. The analysis identified four central analytical dimensions: implementation; governance models and structures; regulation and compliance; and strategic use for public value creation. The study contributes by organizing the field into integrated dimensions, providing insights for the development of more robust data governance strategies in public administration. The key finding from the literature is that data governance has shifted from being viewed merely as a technological challenge to being treated as an institutional capability. The effectiveness of these initiatives depends on organizational structures, role definitions, coordination mechanisms, and top-management support, with technology serving merely as an enabler of the process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Francimayra Oliveira Cardoso, Federal University of Grande Dourados

Master’s student in the Professional Master’s Program in Public Administration at the Federal University of Grande Dourados. Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. E-mail: francimayra.cardoso053@academico.ufgd.edu.br. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2957-2078. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6393326525070816.

Alexandre de Souza Corrêa, Federal University of Grande Dourados

PhD in Regional Development and Agribusiness from the State University of Western Paraná. Associate Professor at the School of Administration, Accounting, and Economics of the Federal University of Grande Dourados. Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. E-mail: alexandrecorrea@ufgd.edu.br. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-5768. Lattes Curriculum: http://lattes.cnpq.br/9158528817351409.

References

ABRAHAM, Rene; SCHNEIDER, Johannes; VOM BROCKE, jan. Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, v. 49, p. 424-438, 1 dez. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008

ALMEIDA, Bethania de Araujo et al. Personal data usage and privacy considerations in the COVID-19 global pandemic. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, v. 25, n. supl. 1, p. 2487-2492, jun. 2020. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.11792020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.511

BARBIERI, Carlos. Governança de dados: práticas, conceitos e novos caminhos. Rio de Janeiro: Alta Books, 2020.

BENFELDT, Olivia; PERSSON, John Stouby; MADSEN, Sabine. Data governance as a collective action problem. Information Systems Frontiers, v. 22, n. 2, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09923-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09923-z

BRASIL. Decreto no 10.046, de 9 de outubro de 2019. Dispõe sobre a governança no compartilhamento de dados na Administração Pública federal, 9 out. 2019. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2019/decreto/D10046.htm. Acesso em: 19 maio 2025.

BRASIL. Ministério da Economia. Impactos econômicos das ações de interoperabilidade implementadas pelo Programa Conecta GOV.BR. Brasília: Ministério da Economia, 2020. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2025.

CALZADA, Igor; ALMIRALL, Esteve. Data ecosystems for protecting European citizens’ digital rights. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, v. 14, n. 2, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/TG-03-2020-0047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2020-0047

CARDOSO, Fabiana Ferreira; MOREIRA, Kleyton Matos; PARENTE, Ronaldo Vasconcelos. Governança digital: uma estratégia para o sucesso da transformação digital na educação pública federal. Revista Sítio Novo, Palmas, v. 9, p. e1795, 2025. Disponível em: https://sitionovo.ifto.edu.br/index.php/sitionovo/article/view/1795. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47236/2594-7036.2025.v9.1795

CARROLL, Stephanie Russo; RODRIGUEZ-LONEBEAR, Desi; MARTINEZ, Andrew. Indigenous data governance: strategies from united states native nations. Data Science Journal, v. 18, n. 1, 2019. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-031

CARVALHO, Rafael de C.; MELO, Claudia de O. Tomada de decisão baseada em dados: avaliando a visualização de informação em dash boards. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SISTEMAS DE INFORMAÇÃO (SBSI), 14., 2018, Caxias do Sul. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: SBC, 2018.

DAMA. DAMA-DMBOK: data management body of knowledge. 2. ed. Nova Jersey, EUA: DAMA Internacional, 2017.

DEPIETRO, Rocco; WIARDA, Edith; FLEISCHER, Mitchell. The context for change: organization, technology and environment. In: TORNATZKY, Louis G.; FLEISCHER, Mitchell (org.). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1990. p. 151-175.

DONGE, W. van; BHAROSA, N.; JANSSEN, M. F. W. H. A. Data-driven government: cross-case comparison of data stewardship in data ecosystems. Government Information Quarterly, v. 39, n. 2, abr. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101642

DONKER, Frederika Welle; LOENEN, Bastiaan van. How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? International Journal of Digital Earth, v. 10, n. 3, p. 284-306, mar. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938

GEGENHUBER, Thomas et al. Orchestrating distributed data governance in open social innovation. Information And Organization, v. 33, n. 1, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100453

HANEEM, F. et al. Determinants of master data management adoption by local government organizations: an empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, v. 45, p. 25-43, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.007

HUANG, Vincent Guangsheng; LYU, Yuexin. The interactive field of open government data: inter-administrative dynamics, trans-local networks, and local geopolitics of environmental data activism in China. Information Communication and Society, v. 25, n. 16, p. 2427-2446, dez. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2022.2128848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2128848

KHATRI, Vijay; BROWN, Carol V. Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, v. 53, n. 1, p. 148-152, jan. 2010. DOI: 10.1145/1629175.1629210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210

KUZIO, Jacqueline et al. Building better global data governance. Data and Policy, v. 4, n. 4, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/dap.2022.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.17

LI, Veronica Q. T.; MA, Liang; WU, Xun. Covid-19, policy change, and post-pandemic data governance: a case analysis of contact tracing applications in East Asia. Policy and Society, v. 41, n. 1, 2022. DOI: 10.1093/polsoc/puab019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puab019

MOORE. Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.

MUSTAFA, Ghulam et al. Blockchain-based governance models in e-government: a comprehensive framework for legal, technical, ethical and security considerations. International Journal of Law and Management, v. 67, n. 1, 2025. DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-08-2023-0172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2023-0172

NIKIFOROVA, Anastasija et al. Theorizing the evolution of public data ecosystems: an empirically grounded multi-generational model and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, v. 42, n. 3, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2025.102062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102062

PAGANI, Regina Negri; KOVALESKI, João Luiz; RESENDE, Luis Mauricio. Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, v. 105, n. 3, p. 2109-2135, dez. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x

PAGANI, Regina Negri et al. Methodi Ordinatio 2.0: revisited under statistical estimation, and presenting FInder and RankIn. Quality & Quantity, v. 57, n. 5, p. 4563-4602, 1 out. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01562-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01562-y

SHEPHERD, Elizabeth et al. Risk identification and management for the research use of government administrative data. Records Management Journal, v. 30, n. 1, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/RMJ-03-2019-0016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-03-2019-0016

SHEPHERD, Elizabeth; STEVENSON, Alice; FLINN, Andrew. Information governance, records management, and freedom of information: A study of local government authorities in England. Government Information Quarterly, v. 27, n. 4, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.02.008

SHEPHERD, Elizabeth; STEVENSON, Alice; FLINN, Andrew. Freedom of Information and records management in local government: Help or hindrance. Information Polity, v. 16, n. 2, 2011a. DOI: 10.3233/IP-2011-0229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0229

SHEPHERD, Elizabeth; STEVENSON, Alice; FLINN, Andrew. Records management in English local government: The effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal, v. 21, n. 2, 2011b. DOI: 10.1108/09565691111152053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111152053

THOMPSON, Nik; RAVINDRAN, Ravi; NICOSIA, Salvatore. Government data does not mean data governance: Lessons learned from a public sector application audit. Government Information Quarterly, v. 32, n. 3, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.001

YUKHNO, Alexander. Digital transformation: exploring big data governance in Public Administration. Public Organization Review, v. 24, n. 1, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-022-00694-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00694-x